Islamic Political Thought
Rethinking on the Backgrounds and Roots of Iranophobia Discourse in International Relations
Document Type : Research Article (International Relation)
Author
Assistant Professor of Political Sciences Faculty at Imam Sadiq University
Abstract
Iranophobia is the hyperreality or representation of Iran’s reality in international relations. With the Baudrillard’s postmodern attitude, we can consider this phenomenon as one of the examples of displacement of the boundary of reality and representation, which was put on the agenda of the West, especially the United States, after the victory of the Islamic Revolution of Iran as a political project. Accordingly, Iranophobia was formed influenced by the cultural nature of the Islamic Revolution and its focus on the soft aspects of power and the reflection of the Islamic Revolution in the international relations and possible challenges to the interests of the West, especially in the Middle East region. Thus, in a short period time of after the Revolution, many of the concepts and developments of Iran’s foreign and domestic politics, including the policy of issuing the revolution, Iran’s support for liberation movements and causes, the Iraqi imposed war on Iran, the human rights issue, Iran’s attempt to achieve military-defensive capabilities, etc. were interpreted with a reverse approach to their reality. This article tried to explain the dimensions and forms of Iranophobia and its consequences in the international relations by analyzing the backgrounds and roots of Iranophobia.
Keywords
Main Subjects
2. Tajik, Mohammad Reza. (2007); Media Diplomacy: Image or Reality, in the book of Media Diplomacy, Strategic Research Institute, Journal of Research, No. 10
3. Javadani Moghaddam, Mehdi., and Nasoohian, Mohammad Mehdi. (2009); The Role of the Islamic Revolution of Iran in the Collective Identification of Shiites in the Middle East, The Islamic Revolutionary Rahyaft Quarterly (First Line), Year III, Issue 9
4. Shariatinia, Mohsen. (2010); Iranophobia: Reasons and Consequences, Foreign Relations Quarterly, Volume 2, Issue 6
5. Malek Mohammadi, Hamid Reza., Davoudi, Mehdi. (2002); The Impact of Iranophobia on Security-Military Policies of the Persian Gulf Cooperation Countries, Quarterly Journal of Politics, Journal of Law and Political Science School, Vol. 42, No. 2
6. Normohammadi, Morteza., and Kazemi, Hojjat. (2002); The Place of Culture in the Formation and Development of Cultural Iranophobia in the Persian Gulf States, Strategic Policy Studies, Volume 3, No. 12
7. Banai Hussein, 2014, the myth of Iranian hegemony, Policy Options, https://www.clarionproject.org
8. Baudrillard, Jean.1988. Simulacra and Simulations, in Selected Writings, Mark Poster (ed.), Stanford: Stanford University Press,
9. Baudrillard, Jean.1991. The Gulf War Did Not Take Place, Guardian,
10. Cordesman Anthony H, Burke Arleigh A, Seitz Adam C.2009. Iranian Weapons of Mass Destruction: Strategic and Warfighting Implications of a Nuclear Armed Iran, Center for Strategic International Studies
11. Eisenstadt Michael, 2015. the Strategic Culture of the Islamic Republic of Iran - The Washington Institute for Near East,
12. Gold Dore, 2015. Iran’s Hegemonic Drive and the Nuclear Talks, Friends of Israel Initiative, http://www.friendsofisraelinitiative.org/
13. Inteligence on Iran, Misslie Arsenal, 2016. www.iranintelligence.com /missiles, 2016
14. Little, R. 2008. The Balance of Power in International Relations: Metaphors, Myths and Models, London: Cambridge University Press.
15. The trend in international transfers of major weapons, 1979—2018. Data and graphic: SIPRI, Sipri.org
16. Wood David. 2012, US-Iran mine warfare Persian Gulf, Huffington post, http://huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/27/us-iran-mine-warfare-persian-gulf_n_1304107.html
)
Volume 6, Issue 1
March 2019Pages 45-63
- Receive Date: 03 November 2018
- Revise Date: 14 November 2018
- Accept Date: 18 February 2019